Re: [Libxmlplusplus-general] resume of one day's work



> > to go a bit slower. Your arrogance is beginning to astound me.
>
> my WHAT ? Now you calm down a bit, will you ?

Hi guys, 

 could you maybe call down _both_ a little. There a actually people using 
libxml++. It doesn't really help if the API and the whole project philosophy 
gets turned upside down everytime a new developer steps up. 
 I know my opinion may be irrelevant, but as a user, I take the freedom to 
express my whish for a API stable 1.0 release before you start to tear each 
other apart over major changes of the whole library design?
 Murray did a lot of work to revive libxml++ development and to get it to an 
API stable version! But, I also think it might be a good idea to go towards a 
real libxml-wrapper, rather than a half reimplementation. But kind, gentle, 
and after 1.0 ? 

peace brothers ;-)
Rolf

***************************************************************
 Rolf Dubitzky  
 e-mail: Rolf Dubitzky Physik TU-Dresden de
 s-mail see http://hep.phy.tu-dresden.de/~dubitzky/
***************************************************************






[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]