Mediation attempt (was Re: [Libxmlplusplus-general] resume of one day's work)
- From: Christophe de VIENNE <cdevienne alphacent com>
- To: libxmlplusplus-general lists sourceforge net
- Subject: Mediation attempt (was Re: [Libxmlplusplus-general] resume of one day's work)
- Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 16:49:07 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
It seems we have a small problem :-/
As the official maintener of libxml++, I must say a few words. My goal here is
to clarify the situation, and to avoid the project to
A few weeks ago we decided with Murray that current API would be the 1.0 one,
and that no changes would be done on it, except for bugfix or adding
validation.
Then Stefan came with really good ideas to make libxml++ a better wrapper of
libxml++. More than that, it would permit to implement easily some features
like xpath.
I'm reminding this to you since, in my opinion, it permit to andersand why
Murray did not appreciate that accessors has been *added*, and so the API
changed (the initial patch of Stefan almost did not change the API, just
reimplemented it differently).
Now I must admit that the tone he used would have irritate almost anybody.
I won't give reason to one or another of the protagonists, I just don't want
the good work of both of you not to be loosed for libxml++. You both have
more experience than me and you cannot image how I appreciate your
participation on the project.
Stefan, the last modifications you added are definitly good ones, but to
preserve everybody's nerves, we'll keep them (iterator stuffs) on the
unstable branch, and the future 1.0 version will keep the current API.
As Murray always did on this project, I invite you to warn us if you're going
to commit some changes (backward compatible or not) in the API, so such
situations won't (I hope) happen again.
Some discussions we had about evolution of the lib were implicitly concerning
the future unstable branch. I could have been more explicit about it, sorry.
Now I let you both "laver votre linge sale entre vous" ;-)
Best regards,
Christophe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAj4/4PMACgkQB+sU3TyOQjBBSACeOuR+19qW2kR3XjcoPj5br7Qy
LicAoI7Wk9tLLM/jP1PNY/7Wb22oxqXQ
=aQ4h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]