Re: [Unhandled node types (was: Re: [libxml++] [ libxmlplusplus-Patches-719921 ] patch to make it co

[Murray Cumming <murrayc usa net>]

Lets's just make a list of the types that still need to be implemented, then
do it. What's on the list?

Christophe de Vienne <cdevienne alphacent com> wrote:
> Le Dimanche 20 Avril 2003 12:36, Christophe de Vienne a écrit :
> > Probably, but in a very short time I'll commit the changes I spoke about
in
> > a previous thread.
> 
> So now an assert replace the warning message.
> This means that some document containing some node type we do not wrap may 
> crash libxml++.
> I guess that all the xmlElementType ending with _NODE has to be handled if
we 
> want the assert not to be reached.
> So the decision to make for now is do we 
>  1) implement the missing types
>  2) remove the assert and silently ignore unknown types.
> 
> Comments / ideas are welcome
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Christophe
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Libxmlplusplus-general mailing list
> Libxmlplusplus-general lists sourceforge net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libxmlplusplus-general



Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com