Re: First attempt on libsoup new-io with caching capabilities

[Sergio Villar Senin <svillar igalia com>]

JFYI, I created a bug in WebKit bugzilla
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40222 to handle the required
WebKitGtk+ changes to make it work with SoupURILoader API.

Regarding the work in libsoup, as you can see here
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=557777 several things are
happening. By one side I'm working in having all the SoupRequest*
implementations correctly working and at the same time, I go on
developing the missing features of the new SoupCache.

Good news is that I managed to get all the WebKit tests working with
this new libsoup and the WebKitGtk+ patch. Hope Dan, or somebody else
would eventually have some time to review it.

Br

En 19/04/10 19:05, Sergio Villar Senin escribiu:
> Hi all,
> 
> I have been working these last weeks in adding caching support for HTTP
> to libsoup. As Dan Winship suggested me, I started taking a look to the
> new-io branch that is supposed to be the starting point of a future
> libsoup "streamed" version. See
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=557777
> 
> I rebased the new-io branch against current master and managed to get
> async methods working. After some more work sync methods work now as
> well although not as reliably as it should. You can test both in get.c
> test for example.
> 
> Finally last week I took a look at Xan Lopez's original implementation
> for soupcache (https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=523100) and
> started to work on it trying to move it to the new libsoup-io API.
> 
> I have a working version of that currently uploaded to gitorious
> http://gitorious.org/libsoup-io-cache/libsoup-io-cache. So if anybody is
> in the mood for reviewing it and give me some feedback that would be great.
> 
> Br
> _______________________________________________
> libsoup-list mailing list
> libsoup-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/libsoup-list
>