Re: [sigc] sigc::trackable::~trackable() is not virtual

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 21:21 +0200, stephan beal wrote:
> > If you can submit a test case I will consider it. I don't think
> there
> > is any bug, so you have to show that it exists.
> 
> The point is that it's officially, according to the C++ Standard, 
> *undefined* behaviour. 

There is no test case that does something that is both
a) undefined behaviour.
and
b) sensible to do with a the class
because
you can not use a non-polymorphic class polymorphically.

If you do indeed have a test case that does both a) and b), just submit
it. Trying to redefine "polymorphic" isn't very helpful. It's quite
clearly defined and understood for C++.


-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com