[sigc] Re: Return values in libsigc++ 2.0

["Timothy M. Shead" <tshead k-3d com>]

Martin Schulze wrote:

> A solution would be transfer some code from sigc::signalN::emit() into
> sigc::internal::signal_emitN::emit() which has a specialization for the
> case that no accumulator is specified. The behaviour would only change
> for the case that an accumulator is specified: the accumulator's  
> operator() would always be called like it was the case for marshallers  
> in 1.2. I think we could consider this as a bug fix so it could go into
> libsigc++-2.0.2 which could be released in a few days time. Does this
> sound like a reasonable plan?

Works for me!  Many thanks!
Tim