[sigc] Re: Return values in libsigc++ 2.0

[Martin Schulze <martin-ml hippogriff de>]

I've committed the necessary change to cvs.
2.0.2 will be released by the end of this weekend.

Regards,

 Martin


Am 2004.05.15 23:42 schrieb(en) Timothy M. Shead:
> Martin Schulze wrote:
>
> > A solution would be transfer some code from sigc::signalN::emit()  
> > into
> > sigc::internal::signal_emitN::emit() which has a specialization for  
> > the
> > case that no accumulator is specified. The behaviour would only  
> > change
> > for the case that an accumulator is specified: the accumulator's   
> > operator() would always be called like it was the case for  
> > marshallers  in 1.2. I think we could consider this as a bug fix so  
> > it could go into
> > libsigc++-2.0.2 which could be released in a few days time. Does  
> > this
> > sound like a reasonable plan?
>
> Works for me!  Many thanks!
> Tim