Re: [sigc] Re: Return values in libsigc++ 2.0
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: Martin Schulze <martin-ml hippogriff de>
- Cc: tshead k-3d com, libsigc-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [sigc] Re: Return values in libsigc++ 2.0
- Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 22:58:51 +0200
On Sat, 2004-05-15 at 18:51 +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> A solution would be transfer some code from sigc::signalN::emit() into
> sigc::internal::signal_emitN::emit() which has a specialization for the
> case that no accumulator is specified. The behaviour would only change
> for the case that an accumulator is specified: the accumulator's
> operator() would always be called like it was the case for marshallers
> in 1.2. I think we could consider this as a bug fix so it could go into
> libsigc++-2.0.2 which could be released in a few days time. Does this
> sound like a reasonable plan?
Will this involve API addition or API change?
--
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
