On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 16:13 +0100, Colin Clark wrote: > Maybe the logic in champlain_view_set_decel_rate is the wrong way > round? It does look like it is the wrong way around :) > What is the correct procedure if I think there is a problem somewhere > in libchamplain? Ask here on this mailing list first to see if I get a > response, or just make an entry on bugs.gnome.org? You may ask here first if you are uncertain that there is a bug (or if it happens only in very complex test case), but I think you are finding valid bugs. Don't hesitate creating bugs on bugs.gnome.org, it's free and we won't hate you (even if it ever turns out a bug is not one). Thanks! Pierre-Luc
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part