Re: [LaTeXila] Bug in Ubuntu Beta Builds?
- From: Philipp Specht <philipp specht googlemail com>
- To: "Matthieu Baerts (matttbe)" <matttbe gmail com>
- Cc: latexila-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [LaTeXila] Bug in Ubuntu Beta Builds?
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:18:52 +0100
Hello
On 10.01.2012 23:04, Matthieu Baerts (matttbe) wrote:
> This is really strange... But how did you compile it? With which
> cmake flags? Did you only use '.c' files or did you translate
> '.vala' files to '.c' files?
I used the simple install procedure proposed in the tarball's INSTALL
file: cmake; make; make install.
> On this ppa, this optionnel flag is used: -DWITH_GNOME=ON (so now
> it requires this package to compile it:
> gsettings-desktop-schemas-dev) But I don't think it's due to this
> flag...
I've got gsettings-desktop-schemas installed, the missing development
headers shouldn't cause segfaults when running an installed program,
so you're very probably right about this not being the cause.
> Do you use a newer version of GLib, GTK or Vala?
Not that I'm aware of, just xubuntu 11.10 with the ubuntu-updates and
ubuntu-security repositories enabled. Installed version of those
libraries:
libglib2.0-0:
Installed: 2.30.0-0ubuntu4
Candidate: 2.30.0-0ubuntu4
Version table:
*** 2.30.0-0ubuntu4 0
500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric/main amd64
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
libgtk2.0-0:
Installed: 2.24.6-0ubuntu5
Candidate: 2.24.6-0ubuntu5
Version table:
*** 2.24.6-0ubuntu5 0
500 http://de.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric/main amd64
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
As for Vala, I'm not sure which package is needed here, since none
seem to be installed on my machine. Could a simple missing dependency
be the cause of that segfault? If so, why does the version I compiled
myself work just fine?
> Do you still have warnings messages if you launch LaTeXila from a
> terminal?
None.
Thanks for the fast response,
Philipp
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]