Re: Clipboard Proxy objects
- From: Ulrik Sverdrup <ulrik sverdrup gmail com>
- To: SanskritFritz <sanskritfritz gmail com>
- Cc: Kupfer list <kupfer-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Clipboard Proxy objects
- Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 20:21:55 +0200
2011/4/24 SanskritFritz <sanskritfritz gmail com>:
>
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Ulrik Sverdrup <ulrik sverdrup gmail com>
> wrote:
>>
>> 2011/4/24 SanskritFritz <sanskritfritz gmail com>:
>> > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Ulrik Sverdrup
>> > <ulrik sverdrup gmail com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The question is: Is it important to keep only the clipboard history in
>> >> the "Clipboard" subcatalog, or should the proxy objects also be inside
>> >> the same catalog? Especially since Karol has been exapnding the
>> >> clipboard history features, I'm wondering if you Karol has an opinion
>> >> about that?
>> >
>> > To be completely honest, I didnt understand you fully. Can you give us
>> > an
>> > example? (before I say "of course it matters what elements my clipboard
>> > history has. I want only clipboard elements there")
>>
>> I mean simply that if you focus the object "Clipboard" in kupfer and
>> press right-arrow to enter it, should you see only the clipboard
>> history or also the proxy objects "Clipboard Text" "Clipboard File"
>> etc (if they are relevant)?
>
> Ah, that should help with identifying the object, should it. So it will be
> only a remark under the text, right? I have no problems with that.
They are two separate objects that are shown if they are relevant. The
names of the objects are "Clipboard Text" and "Clipboard File"
respectively. It's implicit that these represent the current objects
behind these names, just like "Selected Text" (not "Currently Selected
Text")
ulrik
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]