Re: [guppi-list] Re: Patches for Goose
- From: Bradford Hovinen <hovinen redrose net>
- To: Jon Trowbridge <trow emccta com>
- cc: guppi-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [guppi-list] Re: Patches for Goose
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 15:47:03 -0500 (EST)
Well, as I mentioned before, I was planning on working a bit on the
documentation. Which parts do you think would be safest?
"Thou art a soul in bliss, but I am bound
Upon a wheel of fire, that mine own tears
Do scald like molten lead."
-Shakespeare, "King Lear", 4.7.52-53
On Wed, 31 Mar 1999, Jon Trowbridge wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 12:20:29PM +0200, Asger Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> > Only two comments from me: Missing documentation, although I for one
> > shouldn't speak too loud about that.
> Which does raise a real issue... from time to time I've tried to write
> some goose documentation, but it tends to quickly get out-of-date.
> Since parts of the code are starting to settle down now, maybe we
> could declare certain things to be "safe to document", i.e. frozen
> enough that writing up documentation won't be a waste of time...
> (And if anybody wants to add to the documentation, their efforts would
> be welcome...)
> FAQ: Frequently-Asked Questions at http://www.gnome.org/gnomefaq
> To unsubscribe: mail email@example.com with
> "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
] [Thread Prev