Re: Query regarding UPNP action

[tarun.r <tarun r thinkpalm com>]

Hi Sir/Madame,
        I will analyse and try it with UPNP accesible device by start to write a simple control point for it and comeback with doubts, if any. Thank you Jussi and Jens for helping me.Hope we can keep in touch .

With Regards,
Tarun R

On Thursday 02 June 2016 07:04 PM, Jussi Kukkonen wrote:

On 2 June 2016 at 15:56, tarun.r <tarun r thinkpalm com> wrote:

Hello Sir/Madame,
                    As per "http://upnp.org/specs/av/UPnP-av-RenderingControl-v1-Service.pdf"  "As described in Media Renderer device template, the devices’s ConnectionManager::PrepareForConnection() action assigns a InstanceID to the input stream".

    I tried to mute a windows machine in our local network using "Universal-ControlPoint "but it failed so we thought since InstanceID was not correct.Is our understanding is correct?

It's possible, but so are many other things. Look at the actual error you get and find out -- universal-cp should have some warning output but maybe you have to look at the network traffic to see the error code. The service spec will list the error code meanings.

Different instances for RenderingControl _should_ separate various (input) streams and as the same document says "By convention, an InstanceID of 0 indicates that the invoked action should be applied to the post-mixed content." So 0 really should work.

Jussi

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________