Re: [guadec-list] conference software



On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Tobias Mueller <muelli cryptobitch de> wrote:
On Sat, 2017-10-21 at 19:41 +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Tobias Mueller <muelli@cryptobitch.d
e> wrote:
As far as I know, the schedule format was defined by Pentabarf and
nowadays many other applications implement it
Including OSEM? ;-)

Yes. Sorry, I should have mentioned it. ☺

I consider this good reasoning.
FWIW: I didn't intend to recommend one software or advise against
another. But rather refute statements that I believe are wrong in order
to help making a better decision.  I assumed that was one of the things
the original message intended to provoke.

👍

You seem to be all set

More or less, the question of the hosting and sysadmin is still in the air.

but if you're looking for suggestions as to what
features your software should have, I recommend ranking a static export
high on your list of things to look out for. Not only will it make
deployment much easier, but it will also make archiving the whole thing
very easy.

Agreed, this is important. I don’t know if OSEM already does it. I’ll
check and ask for this feature if it’s not already present.

Because GNOME.Asia Summit didn't use OSEM for the last couple of years.

Oh. I’ll get in touch with the OSEM people to check why they claim we did.

-- 
Alexandre Franke
GNOME Hacker & Foundation Director


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]