Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Meson and Autotools, or only Meson?

On Wed, 2020-03-25 at 18:49 +0100, Kjell Ahlstedt via gtkmm-list wrote:
These *mm packages can now be built either with Meson or with

libsigc++-2.0, libsigc++-3.0
glibmm-2.4, glibmm-2.66
pangomm-1.4, pangomm-2.44
(gtkmm-documentation-3,) gtkmm-documentation-4
I've put gtkmm-documentation-3 in parentheses because there is no
released tarball with Meson support, it's only in the git repo.

Some underlying C packages, such as glib and gtk4, have dropped
Autotools support. Shall we do the same, where possible?

I think at least one released tarball must contain both Meson support
and Autotools support before Autotools support can be dropped, or
else will have
problems. Correct me, if I'm wrong here.

At the moment all of the listed packages use Meson when they are
built with jhbuild, but only mm-common does so when it's built with


I don't have enough experience with Meson to give a real opinion. So do
please do what you think makes things easier for people working on the
code. Thanks for pursuing this.

Where would I go to find basic instructions for using Meson with gtkmm
and co. For instance, how would I build with or without our strict
warnings as errors?

Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]