Re: C++11 features, move semantics?
- From: Marcin Kolny <marcin kolny gmail com>
- To: Christof Meerwald <cmeerw cmeerw org>
- Cc: gtkmm-list <gtkmm-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: C++11 features, move semantics?
- Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 19:12:54 +0100
Hi,
I thought about using C++11 a lot in terms of gstreamermm - there is a lot of places where new features should be used (e.g. rvalue references when argument is transfer full etc.). Moreover, it will be easier, when I finish work on using gobject-introspection in mm generators (it's going slow for now because of lack of time, but I'll have more time in the following year).
Unfortunately, using c++11 in gtkmm/glibmm might cause following problems:
- numerous people still use compilers which don't support c++11
- very often it requires modifying interface, and existing code won't work with new version of libraries.
Personally, I'm fan of C++11 and 14 features, but last word belongs to gtkmm/glibmm maintainers.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]