Re: Gtk::VariantIter replacement

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 21:15 +0300, Povietkin Konstantin wrote:
> Gtk::VariantIter is useful only for classes, which are derived from
> Gtk::VariantContainerBase class. Has not it more sense to make
> Gtk::VariantIter more STL-styled?
> 
> For example:
> Gtk::VariantContainerBase::iterator iter;
> Gtk::VariantContainerBase::const_iterator const_iter;
> 
> In my opinion current usage of Gtk::VariantIter is useful only for
> non-OOP languages.
> Am I wrong?

A patch would be welcome, but we must freeze the API very soon. For now,
it's probably just a simple wrapper around the C API.

-- 
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com