Re: Glib::IOChannel in sockets... (2)

[Jonathon Jongsma <jonathon quotidian org>]

On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 20:08 +0100, Krzysztof Kosiński wrote:
> 2010/1/29 Jonathon Jongsma <jonathon quotidian org>:
> > But nearly every function in gio has an overload for when
> > exceptions are disabled, so...
> 
> Maybe glibmm 3.0 should just require exceptions and remove the
> no-exception mode? Is the exception handling overhead large enough to
> warrant maintaining essentially two incompatible versions of the API?
> 
> Regards, Krzysztof

Well, I feel quite strongly that we should abandon the
optional-exceptions approach, but there are differences of opinion here.