Re: gtkmm on Windows: Last steps
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: Armin Burgmeier <armin arbur net>
- Cc: gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gtkmm on Windows: Last steps
- Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 15:04:58 +0100
On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 12:37 +0100, Armin Burgmeier wrote:
> > > > > 1.2
> > > > > I thought that applications would find the DLLs because they are in the
> > > > > same directory. Why is something in the PATH environment variable also
> > > > > needed? I don't understand why MS Visual Studio would need it either if
> > > > > we are using these "property pages".
> > > >
> > > > MSVC++ does not need it to build stuff, but to run or debug from within
> > > > the IDE. I'm not sure whether there is an option in MSVC++ to extend the
> > > > DLL search path that the property pages could set, but I'll check.
> > >
> > > That sounds rather strange. Please do check. It would be nice to remove
> > > the PATH change if possible.
>
> I checked. I was wrong. When running out of the IDE, the PATH variable
> doesn't need to be set to the gtkmm DLL directory. It's only required
> when running it outside the IDE.
I thought we were all sure that the DLLs were found by them being in the
same directory as the executable? I am now confused.
> But I really do wonder how MSVC++ finds
> the correct DLL search path.
>
> So if we want to avoid the PATH change, should we just drop the runtime
> installer? Or, should we only set the PATH variable in the runtime
> installer, but not in the development one, without further asking the
> user?
First let's understand what's happening.
--
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]