Re: Completed what I can in gstreamermm
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: José Alburquerque <jaalburquerque cox net>
- Cc: gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Completed what I can in gstreamermm
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 14:43:43 +0200
On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 11:14 -0400, José Alburquerque wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> > I'm also wondering why you chose to make get_int(), get_uint(), etc,
> > provide a Glib::ValueBase instead of an int, uint, etc. Likewise for
> > set_value() which just takes a ValueBase instead of having method
> > overloads for int, uint, etc.
> > Is that useful somehow? It seems awkward to use that API.
> I was thinking about this yesterday and once more, I misunderstood the
> API (I remember seeing a TODO which I misunderstood to this effect).
> Truthfully, as you say, it is more cumbersome than useful. These can be
> fixed and if you don't get around to it, I will in the near future.
I have changed the Structure API to use real types, but there are some
TODOs left in some set_field() and get_field() methods. Maybe you could
take a look at them.
murrayc murrayc com
] [Thread Prev