Re: Completed what I can in gstreamermm



On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 11:14 -0400, José Alburquerque wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> > I'm also wondering why you chose to make get_int(), get_uint(), etc,
> > provide a Glib::ValueBase instead of an int, uint, etc. Likewise for
> > set_value() which just takes a ValueBase instead of having method
> > overloads for int, uint, etc.
> >
> > Is that useful somehow? It seems awkward to use that API.
> >
> >   
> I was thinking about this yesterday and once more, I misunderstood the 
> API (I remember seeing a TODO which I misunderstood to this effect).  
> Truthfully, as you say, it is more cumbersome than useful.  These can be 
> fixed and if you don't get around to it, I will in the near future.

I have changed the Structure API to use real types, but there are some
TODOs left in some set_field() and get_field() methods. Maybe you could
take a look at them.

-- 
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]