Re: [clutter] cluttermm pure?

[Daniel Oberhoff <daniel oberhoff fit fraunhofer de>]

Am 15.06.2008 um 19:43 schrieb Murray Cumming:

> On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 19:31 +0200, Daniel Oberhoff wrote:
> > , wouldnt it make sense simply to have it a configure option to
> > embedd gtk (also cairo)?
>
> I find it simpler to split libraries up in separate tarballs rather  
> than
> make some parts optional. Distros (Linux or whatever) tend not to  
> split
> them up into separate packages otherwise, leaving you with much the  
> same
> problem as before.
>
> > Then, if requested build separate library
> > binaries for cluttermm-gtk and cluttermm-cairo, and copy the
> > appropriate headers only.
> >
> > > In the short term, you can probably just hack clutter-gtk out of the
> > > build files.
> >
> > Think I'll rather fix clutter-gtk than mess with autotools :).
>
> I'll try to get this done for you, but it might take me a few days to
> have time.

Well, the separation is not so important now. Since clutter-gtk is  
fixed (by patches sent by the author(s) anyhow, suppose svn soon too)  
I am up and running (nearly, still installing doxygen to get the  
cluttermm build through, together with docs). But for the future it  
might make sense, as in a few months I might want to port to the  
iPhone :).

Daniel