Re: giomm API review needed

["Marko Anastasov" <marko anastasov gmail com>]

On Jan 17, 2008 7:02 AM, José Alburquerque <jaalburquerque cox net> wrote:
> Thinking twice about it, I think I'll just work on gstmm for now.  I
> want to make sure it gets done and I may be too much of an extra at this
> point (also, I may be splitting myself between projects which may not be
> good as I'm recently starting to work with gstmm and it may get a bit
> confusing :-).  I actually worked on some of the todo's and thought I
> had a few things working, but after a recent update there were a few
> conflicts and things weren't quite working anymore :-(.  I decided that
> I'd discard the changes (they weren't many) but I did submit a bugzilla
> (they would work against revision 513 but that's not important right
> now).  I could start over, but I really want to cover as much of gstmm
> as I can to see if something there can be released at some point.  Hope
> this is fine.  Thanks.

Sure no problem - I can review your patch when I get back home
in the evening.

    Marko