Re: giomm API review needed

[José Alburquerque <jaalburquerque cox net>]

Marko Anastasov wrote:
> On Jan 16, 2008 7:19 PM, José Alburquerque <jaalburquerque cox net> wrote:
>   
> > Okay;  I'll do what I can and leave the rest.  I still have to do a few
> > things for gstmm, but I'll stop gstmm for a bit (maybe a day or two) and
> > do a little here.  Okay?
> >     
>
> Sure, go ahead :)
>
>     Marko
>   
Marko:

Thinking twice about it, I think I'll just work on gstmm for now.  I 
want to make sure it gets done and I may be too much of an extra at this 
point (also, I may be splitting myself between projects which may not be 
good as I'm recently starting to work with gstmm and it may get a bit 
confusing :-).  I actually worked on some of the todo's and thought I 
had a few things working, but after a recent update there were a few 
conflicts and things weren't quite working anymore :-(.  I decided that 
I'd discard the changes (they weren't many) but I did submit a bugzilla 
(they would work against revision 513 but that's not important right 
now).  I could start over, but I really want to cover as much of gstmm 
as I can to see if something there can be released at some point.  Hope 
this is fine.  Thanks.

-Jose