Re: Two warnings when creating a TreeStore
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: José Alburquerque <jaalburquerque cox net>
- Cc: paul linuxaudiosystems com, gtkmm-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Two warnings when creating a TreeStore
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:43:49 +0200
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 12:07 -0400, Jos�lburquerque wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 11:15 -0400, Jos�lburquerque wrote:
> >
> >> As far as gtkmm and inheritance, I found that if I use something like
> >> TreeModelColumn<MyBaseClass> in a TreeModelColumnRecord, derived members
> >> of MyBaseClass only use the virtual methods of the base class (not the
> >> derived class!), but if I use something like
> >> TreeModelColumn<MyBaseClass*>, dereferencing the pointer to the derived
> >> class later, does use the virtual (overridden) method of the derived
> >> class. Thanks again everyone for your help.
> >>
> >
> > This is just like putting a Derived instance in a std::list<Base>. The
> > Base part will be copied into a new instance in the list, but that
> > instance won't be a Derived. This is how copy-by-value works.
> >
> >
> I see, this is just standard C++. I'm slightly new to C++ (coming from
> C and then Java), but I *am* learning as I go along. :-)
Java doesn't really have copy-by-value for non-fundamental types.
Everything is a reference there. The rough equivalent in C++ is to use
smartpointers or regular pointers (plus your own memory management).
--
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]