Re: Development of gstmm

[José Alburquerque <jaalburquerque cox net>]

Milosz Derezynski wrote:
> Wrapping equals functionality here basically; the more we wrap, the 
> more functionality we get in the direct C++ API (not using C 
> workarounds). So far some substantial part of the basics has been 
> wrapped, but we encountered problems with GstMiniObject at the moment, 
> it being a fundamental type alongside GObject (its counterpart being 
> Glib::Object in glibmm), and we're a little stuck there, but we _are_ 
> actively working on it and development speed and quality has been 
> really good so far.
>
> One we get a few of the current problems resolved, i will put up a 
> page on live.gnome.org <http://live.gnome.org> (although freedesktop 
> might be more appropriate, as GStreamer is hosted on freedesktop 
> nowadays).
>
> BTW, if you have any more questions, please feel free to ask, not only 
> that it will help you, but it might also help us to understand what 
> people expect from the GStreamer C++ bindings.
>
> -- Milosz
Thanks for answering.  I completely understand the development stage 
now.  I thought that gstmm development might need some help, but it is 
clear to me that it is going just fine. :-)  For now, I will try to use 
C in my application.  I look forward to success with gstmm and if I have 
any more questions, I'll ask.  Thanks again.

-Jose