Re: gstmm add element to pipeline test



On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 11:59 -0500, José Alburquerque wrote:
> José Alburquerque wrote:
> > Thanks.  Yes, I suppose that the slot version might be good since it 
> > is how it is done in C by default.  I really appreciate you 
> > committing  these changes for me.  I'm attaching a new version of the 
> > slot example (which parses the message so the error output is more 
> > explicit) and would you also add this small patch which consolidates 
> > the Gst::Bus::add_watch() methods into one (if you think it's 
> > alright)?  It seems better to have just one "do-all" method, unless 
> > you think otherwise.  Thanks.
> >
> I'm sorry, I forgot the changelog.

I've committed that, and your example with some changes. Please avoid
using "using" in example code.

-- 
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]