Re: gstmm add element to pipeline test

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 13:28 -0500, José Alburquerque wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> > I think we should do this in C++ much as it is done in C:
> > - We should have an add_watch(priority) that just causes the signal to
> > be emitted.
> > and
> > - We should have an add_watch(slot) that provides a sigc::slot that is
> > called. We have lots of these set_func(slot)-like functions in gtkmm.
> >   
> 
> As I stepped away a bit, I was just about to write that the 
> gst_bus_add_watch() method could be wrapped (it just hit me).  This what 
> you're saying and the light bulb in my head says this makes sense.  Can 
> I make modifications?  As you say, this message signal patch would not 
> be useful.  Thanks.

I haven't committed any of these patches yet, so please feel free to
give me a new patch to commit instead.

Many thanks, of course.

-- 
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com