Re: gstmm add element to pipeline test

[José Alburquerque <jaalburquerque cox net>]

Murray Cumming wrote:
> I think we should do this in C++ much as it is done in C:
> - We should have an add_watch(priority) that just causes the signal to
> be emitted.
> and
> - We should have an add_watch(slot) that provides a sigc::slot that is
> called. We have lots of these set_func(slot)-like functions in gtkmm.
>   

As I stepped away a bit, I was just about to write that the 
gst_bus_add_watch() method could be wrapped (it just hit me).  This what 
you're saying and the light bulb in my head says this makes sense.  Can 
I make modifications?  As you say, this message signal patch would not 
be useful.  Thanks.

-Jose