On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 03:07 -0500, Paul Davis wrote: > This is when I shamelessly plug scons. > > SCons is good. I agree SCons is a nice system. However, by it's very nature it is slow to start up. No problem for big builds but a pain for small builds and for bash completion. Also, the autoconf, etc. support is not that good -- mostly just a lack of all the stuff out there actually being put into the standard distribution. Waf is a, now incompatible, fork of SCons that has taken different design decisions. I find working with any of SCons, Waf and Rant a whole lot easier than CMake and Autotools. But I suspect this is all now a bit off-topic for this list. PS to Murray -- thanks for the pointers about GTKmm use you just posted on my Web site, I will follow this up. -- Russel. ==================================================== Dr Russel Winder +44 20 7585 2200 41 Buckmaster Road +44 7770 465 077 London SW11 1EN, UK russel russel org uk
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part