Re: [gtkmm] Re: [sigc] Imminent libsigc++ 1.2 API freeze

Am 24.07.2002 22:31 schrieb(en) Murray Cumming:
On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 20:54, Jarek Dukat wrote:
> > That would be hide_return(), I think. I don't think we have that.
> > Something for  libsigc_extras.
> Why extras? If we have bind_return then having hide_return() is nothing
> wrong in base package...

I don't understand that sentence.

To make it clearer: There is no hide_return(). There will not be a
hide_return() in libsigc++ 1.2 unless someone writes it very quickly.

Unless you remove it from libsigc++ 1.2, there _is_ retype_return() which
is equivalent when you use it like so: retype_return<void>().

-- Martin

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]