Re: [gtkmm] Re: [sigc] Imminent libsigc++ 1.2 API freeze

[MHL Schulze t-online de (Martin Schulze)]

Am 24.07.2002 22:31 schrieb(en) Murray Cumming:
> On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 20:54, Jarek Dukat wrote:
> > > That would be hide_return(), I think. I don't think we have that.
> > > Something for  libsigc_extras.
> >
> > Why extras? If we have bind_return then having hide_return() is nothing
> > wrong in base package...
>
> I don't understand that sentence.
>
> To make it clearer: There is no hide_return(). There will not be a
> hide_return() in libsigc++ 1.2 unless someone writes it very quickly.

Unless you remove it from libsigc++ 1.2, there _is_ retype_return() which
is equivalent when you use it like so: retype_return<void>().

-- Martin