Re: [gtkmm] Re: [sigc] Imminent libsigc++ 1.2 API freeze



On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 20:54, Jarek Dukat wrote:
> > That would be hide_return(), I think. I don't think we have that.
> > Something for  libsigc_extras.
> 
> Why extras? If we have bind_return then having hide_return() is nothing
> wrong in base package...

I don't understand that sentence.

To make it clearer: There is no hide_return(). There will not be a
hide_return() in libsigc++ 1.2 unless someone writes it very quickly.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]