Re: [gtkmm] Re: [sigc] Imminent libsigc++ 1.2 API freeze



Am 24.07.2002 21:46 schrieb(en) Murray Cumming:
On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 20:32, Jarek Dukat wrote:
> > Actually I think you want SigC::bind_return().
>
> No. Bind return can't bind `bool foo();' to `void foo()', it works in
> reverse situation.

That would be hide_return(), I think. I don't think we have that.
Something for  libsigc_extras.

Just to make clear: it works like so:

int foo();
Signal0<void> signal0;
signal0.connect(retype_return<void>(slot(&foo)));

Not very intuitive at first sight but easy to remember once you got it.
We could add a stub hide_return() that does exactly the same, though.

Regards,

  Martin



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]