Re: [gtkmm] Re: [sigc] Imminent libsigc++ 1.2 API freeze

[Murray Cumming <murrayc usa net>]

On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 21:26, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Am 24.07.2002 21:46 schrieb(en) Murray Cumming:
> > On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 20:32, Jarek Dukat wrote:
> > > > Actually I think you want SigC::bind_return().
> > >
> > > No. Bind return can't bind `bool foo();' to `void foo()', it works in
> > > reverse situation.
> > 
> > That would be hide_return(), I think. I don't think we have that.
> > Something for  libsigc_extras.
> 
> Just to make clear: it works like so:
> 
> int foo();
> Signal0<void> signal0;
> signal0.connect(retype_return<void>(slot(&foo)));
> 
> Not very intuitive at first sight but easy to remember once you got it.
> We could add a stub hide_return() that does exactly the same, though.

So Jarek is wrong and bind_return _can_ do what he wants?

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com