RE: [gtkmm] gtkmm and vc++6
- From: Cedric Gustin <cgustin ibelgique com>
- To: "John Burris" <BurrisJ linkline com>, "gtkmm-list" <gtkmm-list gnome org>
- Subject: RE: [gtkmm] gtkmm and vc++6
- Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 08:45:59 +0200
At 07:10 PM 7/18/2002 -0700, John Burris wrote:
Yes, I have tried. However, I can't get libsigc++ 1.2 to compile and run
all tests successfully. I tried this with both vc++6 and .NET, with no luck
;-{ . I have given up on this because I don't have enough template
knowledge to create a patch and make this work.
Still the "partial template specialization" problem (not suported by Visual
C++.Net and earlier versions) !
I'm now going to try the
Intel 6.0 compiler. I suspect this will work fine because the Intel
compiler supports all of the ANSI c++ template stuff required by libsigc++.
It will be a few weeks before I can get my hands on the Intel complier.
I'll let you know how it goes and submit a patch sigcconfig.h.in if it
works.
I think we should concentrate on a few (2 or 3) commonly used compilers
instead. Gtkmm compiles fine (even though it's not straightforward "yet")
with mingw32, which is the compiler used by the main author of gtk+ port on
win32 Let's find a way to make it compile with Visual C++ 6 and 7 (I'll try
to find a copy). Murray, maybe it's time to create a new bugzilla topic or
to reopen the "gtkmm should compile (and run) on Windows" one ?
As a side note, I have no problem with gtk+ 2.0 on windows. There have been
a few quirks, but nothing I couldn't figure out and fix or work around. I
even have gnomecanvas working which make be very happy.
That's the reason why Gtk was written in C instead of C++. Cross-platform
portability is much easier than to handle this C++ compilers mess.
Cedric
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]