Future of GtkDatabox
- From: "Dr. Roland Bock" <box2OO6 eudoxos de>
- To: gtkdatabox <gtkdatabox-list gnome org>
- Subject: Future of GtkDatabox
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:38:34 +0100
Dear all!
This message is not easy, but before I start with a lengthy
introduction, here is what is happening:
I am retiring the GtkDatabox project.
What does this mean for the GtkDatabox project?
===============================================
Well, that depends on you! GtkDatabox is an OpenSource project. If you
are interested in seeing future releases, probably with cool new
features, you should do something about it and start coding :-)
The project is registered at SourceForge which offers everything you
need to team up in development and share with others. I would be handing
over the administrator's role to you (same with freshmeat.net and
gnomefiles.org, of course). Just tell me when you are ready.
Why should you enter this project?
==================================
First of all, it is a very rewarding work. I have developed and
maintained GtkDatabox for more than ten years by now and I would not
want to have missed that experience. It is nice to see that others are
using it. Today, the library is available for all major Linux
distributions, I think, as well as for FreeBSD. There are more wrappers
for other languages than C than I can keep track of. The feedback from
users is always cool, because they are giving feedback for the stuff you
develop. Users who are thankful for the widget, users who have new
ideas. Even those who criticize the things you like best are good
because they help you to question and potentially improve you design :-)
The feedback in total helps in becoming a better developer. You will
learn more about generality, system dependencies, but also coding style
and software design.
And last, but not least: If you are using GtkDatabox, actively
developing it is certainly the best way to make sure that you will be
able to use it with the next release of gcc or gtk+, etc.
Who should do this?
===================
Personally, I would hope for three or four persons to share the project.
I have talked to a few people in advance and Brian Phelps is interested
in joining, but I am convinced that a few more hands would be great!
So do not hesitate. Start organizing the take-over. There is nothing to
lose but much to gain!
Why do I leave the project?
===========================
When I started the project in September 1998, I was developing and using
GtkDatabox very intensively during my doctorate studies, analyzing
spectra of magnesium ion lines. This phase lasted until early Summer 1999.
In Autumn 1999 I joined a company of search engine specialists (no, not
Google) and worked as a development manager. In my spare time, until
now, I enjoyed to keep in touch with actual development by continuing
the GtkDatabox project although I stopped using it myself almost nine
years ago because all my work is about server software.
In April I teamed up with a few colleagues from the old company to found
a new one. I am developing C++ server software at work now. It is very
demanding work in a cool team, but it also means that I am inwardly
moving away from GtkDatabox.
During the past few years, I added a lot of new things to the library.
My personal highlights were introducing the modularized graph stuff,
adding the rulers which can handle logarithmic scales and last but not
least finally providing a basic documentation. Documentation was a bit
of a struggle, but the rest was pretty interesting and often real fun!
Today, with the enhancements and the documentation in place, I can
truthfully say: the GtkDatabox widget has reached the kind of maturity I
wanted. The project is kind of completed for me and I consider my work
to be done.
So that's why I am retiring from the project.
But you, who are using the library: Take a heart and join in! Especially
if you have never participated in OpenSource development before. It is a
very good experience! I sure you have ideas for new features, better
interfaces, whatever. Realize them and share them with others. It's
worth the effort!
Thanks and regards,
Roland
[
Date Prev][Date Next] [
Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]