Re: [gtk-vnc-devel] Releasing proposal
- From: Jonh Wendell <jwendell gnome org>
- To: Anthony Liguori <anthony codemonkey ws>
- Cc: gtk-vnc-devel List <gtk-vnc-devel lists sourceforge net>
- Subject: Re: [gtk-vnc-devel] Releasing proposal
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:26:01 -0300
Em Seg, 2008-02-18 às 15:37 -0600, Anthony Liguori escreveu:
> >
> > If an user run vinagre against gtk-vnc 0.3.4 (when it's released), it
> > will find a bad behavior in fullscreen mode, because I'm using old
> > set_pointer() behavior.
> >
>
> How bad will the behavior be? If it's unacceptable, I'm willing to say
> that the old behavior was part of the old interface and introduce a new
> interface that behaves "properly".
See, users have complained about the focus issue, which was fixed after
0.3.3. So, the fix will be available in 0.3.4.
Then I can't just say: upgrade gtk-vnc to 0.3.4, because this new
version is too different from previous, with new symbols, and worse: new
behavior.
> > So, I could guarantee to vinagre's users that it will work with gtk-vnc
> > 0.3.x.
> >
>
> I'd like to keep users working as much as possible. If that means
> introduce API warts, I'm okay with that. Eventually, once we've got
> enough confidence that we know how to do it right, we'll break the API
> only once and get rid of the warts.
We were releasing 0.1, 0.2, 0.3.
0.3.1 came because 0.3.0 tarball was broken, and 0.3.1 was a fix only
release.
Why not continue with this approach?
Cheers,
--
Jonh Wendell
www.bani.com.br
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]