Re: Namespace request

["Ross McFarland" <rwmcfa1 neces com>]

Ari Jolma said:

> Wasn't the XS not the decisive thing? For example I'm developing stuff
> which contains XS code and links to C but plan to (real soon now)
> release it in the namespace Gtk2::Ex::Geo::* (as was discussed here
> before). Are you suggesting Gtk2::Phat since libphat is a collection of
> _GTK widgets_ written in C? (I read this from
> http://flosspick.org/package/full/libphat0, I'm not familiar with
> libphat otherwise). Or am I just missing something?

if the C code is included in your perl module and bound with XS then it
belongs in the Ex namespace. Ex is for selfcontained add on type stuff. non-Ex
name spaces are for bindings of external modules.

that is the currently scheme/thinking. and i've yet to see where it falls
short of my intentions. apparently i haven't done a very good job of spelling
out the 'guidelines' so i'll look into that, the results of which will end up
on http://gtk2-perl-ex.sourceforge.net/

-rm