Re: Gtk2::Pango for Pango constants -- comments, please



"muppet" wrote:

i haven't committed it to CVS yet, because i wanted some comments first, and
sf's anoncvs seems to be rather flakey lately, anyway.

To make it short: I can't see any reason not to commit it ;)

Regards,

Joern

-- 
Joern Reder
Development Head ZYN! Coding Division - http://www.zyn.de/

Attachment: pgpYCiXnkUHRm.pgp
Description: PGP signature



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]