Re: [gtk-osx-users] New build system (continued).

[Pascal <p p14 orange fr>]

> Le 15 avr. 2019 à 01:38, John Ralls <jralls ceridwen us> a écrit :
>
> > On Apr 14, 2019, at 12:50 PM, Pascal <p p14 orange fr> wrote:
> >
> > John,
> >
> > 1) Here is backtrace of crash log:
> > Crashed Thread:        0  Dispatch queue: com.apple.main-thread
> > Exception Type:        EXC_CRASH (SIGABRT)
> > Exception Codes:       0x0000000000000000, 0x0000000000000000
> > Exception Note:        EXC_CORPSE_NOTIFY
> > Termination Reason:    LIBSYSTEM, [0x2]
> > Application Specific Information:
> > %%n used in a non-immutable format string: %s
> > Thread 0 Crashed:: Dispatch queue: com.apple.main-thread
> > 0   libsystem_kernel.dylib           0x00007fff6d1eeeb6 __abort_with_payload + 10
> > 1   libsystem_kernel.dylib           0x00007fff6d1e92b8 abort_with_payload_wrapper_internal + 89
> > 2   libsystem_kernel.dylib           0x00007fff6d1e92e5 abort_with_payload + 9
> > 3   libsystem_c.dylib                0x00007fff6d0ffecc _os_crash_fmt + 182
> > 4   libsystem_c.dylib                0x00007fff6d1368a8 __vfprintf + 16526
> > 5   libsystem_c.dylib                0x00007fff6d15b059 __v2printf + 473
> > 6   libsystem_c.dylib                0x00007fff6d14034b _vsnprintf + 415
> > 7   libsystem_c.dylib                0x00007fff6d1403fe vsnprintf + 80
> > 8   libsystem_c.dylib                0x00007fff6d1700ad __sprintf_chk + 142
> > 9   conftest                         0x000000010d4b3f2f main + 79
> > 10  libdyld.dylib                    0x00007fff6d09f015 start + 1
> >
> > 2) Here is expat config.log:
> > <config_expat.log>
>
> Pascal,
>
> The vsnprintf assert is an Apple "feature" for security. Gtk-osx's bootstrap.modules patches bison to avoid 
> the bug, and I'm close to updating to the latest bison in which that's fixed. Rerun bootstrap and when 
> bison fails pick "wipe directory and start over" so that the patch applies.
>
> For expat it looks like you've got both -arch i386 and -arch x86_64 somehow. That doesn't work, you have to 
> build libraries twice and then merge them, but you don't really want to do that; just build for x86_64.

Yes John, I suspected something like that but I haven't asked for -arch i386.

How can I prevent i386?

Thanks, Pascal.
http://blady.pagesperso-orange.fr