Re: Misconduct of GTK+/glib Bugtracker Admins

[IgnorantGuru <ignorantguru openmailbox org>]

On Thu, 4 Jun 2015 17:53:22 -0400
Paul Davis <paul linuxaudiosystems com> wrote:

> You are the person who began their first post on the bug with "I
> realize that GTK development is effectively dead for non-Gnome
> projects,..."

Indeed, I do realize that.  Perhaps your opinion of the situation differs.  Does that invalidate mine?  I was 
merely saying that I didn't expect much from them, but in case they were interested in keeping support alive, 
here's how they could do it.

>  In your second post, you added "We are doing so here,
> and as usual, those needs are summarily dismissed if not coming from
> Red Hat". It is you who was inflammatory and irrelevant.

Actually, since a Red Hat employee immediately dismissed the bug (as usual), and the request didn't come from 
Red Hat, and I have seen this behavior numerous times, I found it highly relevant to point out.  I don't view 
it as inflammatory but challenging.  As in, "here is what I find dissatisfactory in your pattern of responses 
to bugs like this one."  And I was giving him an opportunity to demonstrate a new response.

I notice, like Robert Schroll, that you overlook many aspects of their behavior and are merely nitpicking my 
choice of words and how I express my perspective.  You don't seem to have any appreciation for differences of 
opinion being expressed.