Re: GTK+ 3.6.1 for Win32 (Runtime & Bundle)

[tarnyko tarnyko net]

Hi Antonio, 

I am glad you like it. 

.lib import libraries ? I honestly didn't even think about that. I am a 
little confused, as I thought GTK+ headers weren't even compatible with 
VC++. 

BTW I just tried to compile a simple example with the same compiler as you, 
and got a lot of these errors : 

gtrashstack.h(55) : error C2143: syntax error : missing ';' before '{'
gtrashstack.h(63) : error C2085: 'g_trash_stack_pop' : not listed in formal 
parameters list 

and I don't really know what "inline=" is (*shame*). 

I'm OK to provide .lib files, but I first need a little bit of help on these 
subjects. 

Regards, Tarnyko 


Antonio Scuri writes: 

>   Hi Tarnyko, 
>
>   I think you guys are doing a great job. Thanks. 
>
>   Comparing this installation to the 2.24 available on gtk.org I just miss
> the .lib files compatible with Visual C++. I think they are simple to be
> built using the DLLs and the DEFs. 
>
>   BTW to use your distribution with Visual C++ I had to define "inline=" to
> avoid a compilation error, at least in Visual C++ 9 (Visual Studio 2008).  
>
> Best Regards,
> Antonio Scuri 
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: gtk-list-bounces gnome org [mailto:gtk-list-bounces gnome org] On
> > Behalf Of tarnyko tarnyko net
> > Sent: sexta-feira, 23 de novembro de 2012 07:24
> > To: gtk-list gnome org
> > Subject: Re: GTK+ 3.6.1 for Win32 (Runtime & Bundle) 
> >
> > Hi Andy, 
> >
> > I have no relation with the GTK+ team. 
> >
> > Regarding the packages, I think the problem is just, they don't have any
> > official maintainer now. I once tried to "push" them to gtk.org, but the
> > mail addresses listed here (https://live.gnome.org/GtkTasks) do not exist
> > anymore, and nobody did answer me on IRC (#gtk+). 
> >
> > As far as I know, we are 2 persons knowing how to compile GTK3 win32
> > binaries. I am more specialized in producing installers. 
> >
> > Regards. 
> >
> > Andy Spencer writes: 
> >
> > > On 2012-11-23 02:22, tarnyko tarnyko net wrote:
> > >> New installers are available for GTK+ 3.6.1 on MS-Windows.
> > >
> > > Thanks, I curious though, what's the relation between this and the
> > > "official" packages on gtk.org? I've noticed that they've been on 2.24
> > > and 2.22 for quite some time. Do you know if there's anything preventing
> > > an official version of Gtk 3.x for Windows?
> > _______________________________________________
> > gtk-list mailing list
> > gtk-list gnome org
> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-list mailing list
> gtk-list gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list