RE: GTK+ 3.6.1 for Win32 (Runtime & Bundle)
- From: "Antonio Scuri" <antonio scuri gmail com>
- To: <gtk-list gnome org>
- Subject: RE: GTK+ 3.6.1 for Win32 (Runtime & Bundle)
- Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 10:39:44 -0200
Hi Tarnyko,
I think you guys are doing a great job. Thanks.
Comparing this installation to the 2.24 available on gtk.org I just miss
the .lib files compatible with Visual C++. I think they are simple to be
built using the DLLs and the DEFs.
BTW to use your distribution with Visual C++ I had to define "inline=" to
avoid a compilation error, at least in Visual C++ 9 (Visual Studio 2008).
Best Regards,
Antonio Scuri
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gtk-list-bounces gnome org [mailto:gtk-list-bounces gnome org] On
> Behalf Of tarnyko tarnyko net
> Sent: sexta-feira, 23 de novembro de 2012 07:24
> To: gtk-list gnome org
> Subject: Re: GTK+ 3.6.1 for Win32 (Runtime & Bundle)
>
> Hi Andy,
>
> I have no relation with the GTK+ team.
>
> Regarding the packages, I think the problem is just, they don't have any
> official maintainer now. I once tried to "push" them to gtk.org, but the
> mail addresses listed here (https://live.gnome.org/GtkTasks) do not exist
> anymore, and nobody did answer me on IRC (#gtk+).
>
> As far as I know, we are 2 persons knowing how to compile GTK3 win32
> binaries. I am more specialized in producing installers.
>
> Regards.
>
> Andy Spencer writes:
>
> > On 2012-11-23 02:22, tarnyko tarnyko net wrote:
> >> New installers are available for GTK+ 3.6.1 on MS-Windows.
> >
> > Thanks, I curious though, what's the relation between this and the
> > "official" packages on gtk.org? I've noticed that they've been on 2.24
> > and 2.22 for quite some time. Do you know if there's anything preventing
> > an official version of Gtk 3.x for Windows?
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-list mailing list
> gtk-list gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]