Re: g_assert vs. g_return_if_fail
- From: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad esfahbod gmail com>
- To: Martin Kalbfuß <ma kalbfuss web de>
- Cc: Gtk+ <gtk-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: g_assert vs. g_return_if_fail
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:58:04 -0500
On 01/20/2010 05:40 PM, Martin Kalbfuß wrote:
> But shouldn't the function return GError in such a case?
>
> g_return_if_fail is like retunring an error without the ability to
> handle it. I'm still not sure when to use it.
g_return_if_fail() should be used to catch programmer error ONLY. There is no
point in returning a GError in such cases.
behdad
> I assume g_assert is only useful in programs and internal library
> functions.
>
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 21.01.2010, 00:41 +0300 schrieb LRN:
>> nd, AFAIK, it also logs warnings.
>
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-list mailing list
> gtk-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]