Re: g_assert vs. g_return_if_fail
- From: Martin Kalbfuß <ma kalbfuss web de>
- To: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad behdad org>
- Cc: Gtk+ <gtk-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: g_assert vs. g_return_if_fail
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:03:24 +0100
Thanks,
But why is it a disastrous idea?
When It's a clear programming error, why not abort the program with
g_assert?
Am Mittwoch, den 20.01.2010, 12:23 -0500 schrieb Behdad Esfahbod:
> On 01/20/2010 12:28 PM, Martin Kalbfuß wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I don't understand the need for g_return_if_fail like functions. Why not
> > use g_assert here?
> >
> > In pure C, I used either assert for programming errors or returned an
> > error indicator for expected errors. But where to use g_return_if_fail?
>
> g_assert aborts the process, g_return_if_fail() doesn't. It's a disastrous
> idea to g_assert() in a library for example.
>
>
>
> behdad
>
>
> > Thanks.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]