Re: Compiling gtk2 on HP-UX 11.11? (longer)

[Rick Jones <rick jones2 hp com>]

Roman Toenshoff wrote:
> * Rick Jones <rick jones2 hp com> [060216 20:55]:
>
> > Ah, did you teach cairo where to find whatever it wanted from stdint.h? Was 
> > cairo's configure script missing a check for stdint.h to allow for 
> > conditional include? Regardless by all means feed those changes back.
>
>
> Hmm, i think i was not so very smart. I just searched the header (pixman.h)
> and commented out the line where stdint.h was included. :)

:)  I wonder on which platforms it needs stdint.h and what it takes from there. 
 Is there a config.h file after configure and if so, is there anthing about 
stdint in it - say "HAVE_STDINT_H" or somesuch?  If so, wrapping that #include 
around #ifdef HAVE_STDINT_H  #endif is probably the clean thing to do and submit 
as a patch.

>  
>
> > It would be good to know just where they are dumping core, so finding the 
> > core files and getting the stack traces and/or running the failing programs 
> > under a debugger would be a good first step.
>
>
> Here is a part of gdb from new gqview. Alle testprograms are doing like this:
>
> (gdb) run
> Starting program: /usr/local/bin/gqview 
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x79c320d4 in g_type_iface_meta_marshal (closure=0x40095448,
> return_value=0x0, 
>     n_param_values=3, param_values=0x7a003128, invocation_hint=0x7a0033f0, 
>     marshal_data=0xc) at gclosure.c:590
> 590       callback = G_STRUCT_MEMBER (gpointer, class, offset);
> (gdb)
>  
> (gdb) bt
> #0  0x79c320d4 in g_type_iface_meta_marshal (closure=0x40095448, 
>     return_value=0x0, n_param_values=3, param_values=0x7a003128, 
>     invocation_hint=0x7a0033f0, marshal_data=0xc) at gclosure.c:590
> #1  0x79c31830 in g_closure_invoke (closure=0x40095448, return_value=0x0, 
>     n_param_values=3, param_values=0x7a003128, invocation_hint=0x7a0033f0)
>     at gclosure.c:492
> #2  0x79c4c538 in signal_emit_unlocked_R (node=0x40095528, detail=0, 
>     instance=0x400918e0, emission_return=0x0,
> instance_and_params=0x7a003128)
>     at gsignal.c:2523
> #3  0x79c4db6c in g_signal_emit_valist (instance=0x400918e0, signal_id=24, 
>     detail=0, var_args=0x7a003070) at gsignal.c:2244
> #4  0x79c4ddcc in g_signal_emit_by_name (instance=0x400918e0, 
>     detailed_signal=0x78fac728 "delete_text") at gsignal.c:2312
> #5  0x7923fa00 in gtk_entry_delete_text ()
>    from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.sl
> #6  0x79238d08 in gtk_editable_delete_text ()
>    from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.sl
> #7  0x792454b4 in gtk_entry_set_text () from
> /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.sl
> #8  0x791ee758 in gtk_combo_update_entry ()
>    from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.sl
> #9  0x791ee7ec in gtk_combo_selection_changed ()
>    from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.sl
> #10 0x79c4e554 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID (closure=0x4009c9b0, 
> ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
>     return_value=0x4009522c, n_param_values=1, param_values=0x40095244, 
>     invocation_hint=0x7a002cf0, marshal_data=0x0) at gmarshal.c:77
> #11 0x79c31830 in g_closure_invoke (closure=0x4009c9b0, return_value=0x0, 
>     n_param_values=1, param_values=0x7a002a28, invocation_hint=0x7a002cf0)
>     at gclosure.c:492
> #12 0x79c4cb5c in signal_emit_unlocked_R (node=0x4009ac08, detail=0, 
>     instance=0x4009c808, emission_return=0x0,
> instance_and_params=0x7a002a28)
>     at gsignal.c:2485
> #13 0x79c4db6c in g_signal_emit_valist (instance=0x4009c808, signal_id=138, 
>     detail=0, var_args=0x7a002978) at gsignal.c:2244
> #14 0x793c7e30 in gtk_signal_emit () from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.sl
> #15 0x79318d58 in gtk_list_signal_item_select ()
>    from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.sl
> #16 0x79c4e554 in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID (closure=0x400a1248, 
>     return_value=0x4009522c, n_param_values=1, param_values=0x40095244, 
>     invocation_hint=0x7a002770, marshal_data=0x0) at gmarshal.c:77
> #17 0x79c31830 in g_closure_invoke (closure=0x400a1248, return_value=0x0, 
>     n_param_values=1, param_values=0x7a0024a8, invocation_hint=0x7a002770)
>     at gclosure.c:492
> #18 0x79c4cb5c in signal_emit_unlocked_R (node=0x4006e1f8, detail=0, 
>     instance=0x40064288, emission_return=0x0, instance_and_params=0x7a0024a8)
>     at gsignal.c:2485
> #19 0x79c4db6c in g_signal_emit_valist (instance=0x40064288, signal_id=89, 
>     detail=0, var_args=0x7a002434) at gsignal.c:2244
> #20 0x79c4df5c in g_signal_emit (instance=0x79c0e658, signal_id=1074352684, 
>     detail=1) at gsignal.c:2288
> #21 0x792f6c28 in gtk_item_select () from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.sl
> #22 0x7931ad50 in gtk_list_item_select () from
> /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.sl
> #23 0x79315a4c in gtk_real_list_select_child ()
>    from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.sl
> #24 0x79c4f45c in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT (closure=0x4009ac80, 
>     return_value=0x4009522c, n_param_values=1, param_values=0x7a001e28, 
>     invocation_hint=0x7a0020f0, marshal_data=0x78f9640a) at gmarshal.c:636
> #25 0x79c32040 in g_type_class_meta_marshal (closure=0x4009ac80, 
>     return_value=0x0, n_param_values=2, param_values=0x7a001e28, 
>     invocation_hint=0x7a0020f0, marshal_data=0x1a4) at gclosure.c:569
> #26 0x79c31830 in g_closure_invoke (closure=0x4009ac80, return_value=0x0, 
>     n_param_values=2, param_values=0x7a001e28, invocation_hint=0x7a0020f0)
>     at gclosure.c:492
> #27 0x79c4c184 in signal_emit_unlocked_R (node=0x4009b3b0, detail=0, 
>     instance=0x4009c808, emission_return=0x0, instance_and_params=0x7a001e28)
>     at gsignal.c:2415
> #28 0x79c4db6c in g_signal_emit_valist (instance=0x4009c808, 
>     signal_id=1074107648, detail=0, var_args=0x7a001d74) at gsignal.c:2244
> #29 0x793c7e30 in gtk_signal_emit () from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.sl
> #30 0x79313e94 in gtk_list_select_child ()
>    from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.sl
> #31 0x79312c00 in gtk_list_insert_items ()
>    from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.sl
> #32 0x79312d34 in gtk_list_append_items ()
>    from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.sl
> #33 0x79311ba4 in gtk_list_add () from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.sl
> #34 0x79c4f45c in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT (closure=0x400625e0, 
>     return_value=0x4009522c, n_param_values=1, param_values=0x7a0016a8, 
>     invocation_hint=0x7a001970, marshal_data=0x78f963e2) at gmarshal.c:636
> #35 0x79c32040 in g_type_class_meta_marshal (closure=0x400625e0, 
>     return_value=0x0, n_param_values=2, param_values=0x7a0016a8, 
>     invocation_hint=0x7a001970, marshal_data=0x16c) at gclosure.c:569
> #36 0x79c31830 in g_closure_invoke (closure=0x400625e0, return_value=0x0, 
>     n_param_values=2, param_values=0x7a0016a8, invocation_hint=0x7a001970)
>     at gclosure.c:492
> #37 0x79c4c184 in signal_emit_unlocked_R (node=0x40062628, detail=0, 
>     instance=0x4009c808, emission_return=0x0,
> instance_and_params=0x7a0016a8)
>     at gsignal.c:2415
> #38 0x79c4db6c in g_signal_emit_valist (instance=0x4009c808, 
>     signal_id=1074107648, detail=0, var_args=0x7a001630) at gsignal.c:2244
> #39 0x79c4df5c in g_signal_emit (instance=0x79c0e658, signal_id=1074352684, 
>     detail=1) at gsignal.c:2288
> #40 0x79208174 in gtk_container_add () from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.sl
> #41 0x791f058c in gtk_combo_set_popdown_strings ()
>    from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.sl
> #42 0x00025740 in tab_completion_new_with_history (entry=0x400593a4,text=0x0, 
>     history_key=0xc1f78 "path_list", max_levels=32, 
>     enter_func=0x4000f17a <_crt_errno+7002>, data=0x40059380)
>     at ui_tabcomp.c:640
> #43 0x0004ec70 in layout_tool_setup (lw=0x40059380) at layout.c:177
> #44 0x0004f8d0 in layout_tools_new (lw=0x40059380) at layout.c:494
> #45 0x000513d8 in layout_grid_setup (lw=0x40059380) at layout.c:1226
> #46 0x000521cc in layout_new (path=0x0, popped=1073787776, hidden=1074153360)
>     at layout.c:1662
> #47 0x00059d3c in main (argc=1, argv=0x7a0010dc) at main.c:533
> #48 0x79ef3460 in _start () from /usr/lib/libc.2
>
> Is this somehow interesting? I have no experience with gdb.
> Any hints?

Not directly to me, but hopefully to others watching it says something.  You 
could look at the local variables being manipulted by the routines - for 
example, is return_value supposed to be a pointer, and if so, is something in 
g_type_iface_meta_marshal trying to dereference it - do the rest of the parms 
look sane for their types etc etc.

I will say that is the deepest stacktrace I think I've ever seen (perhaps I 
don't get out enough :).  While I have no certainty stack overflow would cause a 
SEGV, you might try increasing maxssiz (IIRC) in your kernel.

rick jones

> TIA
> Roman Tönshoff
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-list mailing list
> gtk-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list