Re: Available GTK Developers
- From: Mark Gordon <mtgordon ximian com>
- To: Valdis Kletnieks vt edu
- Cc: gtk-list gnome org, "Bartholomew, Esther" <e bartholomew huxley com>, Roger Leigh <rleigh whinlatter ukfsn org>
- Subject: Re: Available GTK Developers
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:51:08 -0400
On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 15:25 -0400, Valdis Kletnieks vt edu wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 18:28:38 BST, Roger Leigh said:
>
> > I am a GTK+ developer based in Blackburn, Lancashire. My CV is
> > available here:
> >
> > http://www.whinlatter.ukfsn.org/cv.pdf
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulder_Pledge
In a discussion in which it has been asserted that there's a severe
shortage of GTK developers ("only a handful of hobbyists") and that ISVs
should subsequently use other toolkits ("Here, buy a pack of Chewlies
gum!"), I see the demonstration of a counterexample as part of the
discussion rather than an advertisement.
<reductio_ad_absurdum> Would a .signature including a link to the
senders home page (which includes a link to the sender's CV) constitute
spam? I think that's taking it a bit far. </reductio_ad_absurdum>
-Mark Gordon
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]