RE: [gtk-list] Re: (off topic answer, but funny) A "dumb" questio n ne eds an answer.. Y2K??

["Arjan J. Molenaar" <arjan xirion nl>]

Consider it "Y2K compliant with minor inconveniences". It works for M$ :-)
(Although there are none, of course)

Arjan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Hébert [mailto:Steven.Hebert@bauernike.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 08, 1999 4:59 PM
> To: gtk-list@redhat.com
> Subject: [gtk-list] Re: (off topic answer, but funny) A 
> "dumb" questio n
> ne eds an answer.. Y2K??
> 
> 
> Ya, that elevator may not stop and go through the roof.
> That safety system(not controled by a computer) may stop working.
> 
> I bet his boss won't be waering a watch, affraid that it might blowout
> at 00:00 01/01/2000.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ostroff, Jack H [mailto:jack_h_ostroff@groton.pfizer.com]
> > Sent: Monday, November 08, 1999 10:54 AM
> > To: 'gtk-list@redhat.com'
> > Subject: [gtk-list] RE: (off topic answer, but funny) A 
> > "dumb" question
> > ne eds an answer.. Y2K??
> > 
> > 
> > What about the computers which control the elevators in the 
> building?
> > 
> > > From: Steven Hébert [mailto:Steven.Hebert@bauernike.com]
> > > 
> > > Maybe you should ask your employers their cars are Y2K compliant.
> > > That should really freak 'em out. =]
> > > 
> > > > From: Marc [mailto:marcael@home.com]
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the reply Erik...
> > > > 
> > > > Unfortunately, my employer DOES believe in the Y2K FUD.  
> > 
> > -- 
> > To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe 
> > gtk-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe 
> gtk-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
>