Re: [gtk-list] Re: A "dumb" question needs an answer.. Y2K??
- From: Erik Mouw <J A K Mouw its tudelft nl>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: A "dumb" question needs an answer.. Y2K??
- Date: Mon, 8 Nov 99 17:00:02 +0100
On Mon, 08 Nov 1999 16:51:05 +0100, Erik Mouw wrote:
Sorry, that Ctrl-S was meant for XEmacs...
> On Mon, 08 Nov 1999 11:52:54 -0500, Marc wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the reply Erik...
>>
>> Unfortunately, my employer DOES believe in the Y2K FUD. They
>> want to remove ANY software that has not been deemed Y2K compliant
>> even if it isn't mission critical in and of itself. They believe
>> that any application like this could cause systems to crash or
>> cause other applications to malfunction.
>
> You mean that the people responsible for Y2K testing in your company don't
> know what the Y2K problem really is?
>
> Now if you just promise them that you won't
OK, what I wanted to say: Now if you just promise them that you don't use
Gimp on december 31, nothing can go wrong.
What happens if they remove Gimp&friends. The Y2K will pass, and then? Are
you allowed to re-install the software on 01-jan-2000? This is of course
exactly the same as promising that you won't use Gimp. If your Y2K team
accepts this last one, they are really clueless.
>> On your other note, yes, I could do the Y2K testing myself, but the
>
> No. If your company is really serious about Y2K, the Y2K test team should
> do the audit because that's their job. If they don't know how to do that,
> then the wrong people are set on that job.
>
>> process we have in place for testing and entering it into our
>> Y2K compliant database is extremely time consuming. Of course it
>> is... why would you expect them to use common sense with that aspect
>> of it if they aren't using it in deciding which apps are and are not
>> Y2K compliant. I was just hoping for some "golden" statement I can
>> use to fight my cause or a web page like the one at:
>>
>> http://www.rru.com/~meo/gimp/y2k.html for the gimp itself.
>>
>> I know it's ridiculous that they will accept pages like this
>> as proof, but will not just take my word for it. Anyone can
>> put up a web page. Yes, it is quite ridiculous. I suppose
>> I can put up a page saying that I checked everything and it
>> looks compliant to me. They may accept that, but if they
>> found out that I was the author who knows what they'd do. :-)
Hey, I can put up a page for your company ;-).
Erik
--
J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department
of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems,
Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands
Phone: +31-15-2785859 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl
WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]