Re: [gtk-list] Re: (off topic answer, but funny) A "dumb" question ne eds an answer.. Y2K??

[Kevin Handy <kth srv net>]

"Arjan J. Molenaar" wrote:
> 
> Consider it "Y2K compliant with minor inconveniences". It works for M$ :-)
> (Although there are none, of course)

I've seen those pages too. I especially like the Windows 3.11 which is
Y2K
compliant except that there are several programs that won't work,
and they (MS) won't fix them.