Re: [gtk-list] Re: Unix Memory Management : Clearing up a few misconceptions (was Re: how can I trust glib when it has so manymemleaks?)

From: Andy Kahn <kahn zk3 dec com>
To: Michael Babcock <mbabcock la creatureshop henson com>
Cc: gtk-list redhat com
Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: Unix Memory Management : Clearing up a few misconceptions (was Re: how can I trust glib when it has so manymemleaks?)
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 16:51:35 -0500

On Thu, Mar 18, 1999 at 01:06:36PM -0800, Michael Babcock wrote:
...
> 
> According to "ps axm" the SIZE of the process does shrink. Dramatically.
> Is ps not a valid way to determine the memory allocated to a process?

which "SIZE" are you reading from your ps output?  is it the resident
set size or the virtual set size?
--andy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [gtk-list] Re: Unix Memory Management : Clearing up a few misconceptions (was Re: how can I trust glib when it has so manymemleaks?)
  - From: Michael Babcock

References:
- Re: [gtk-list] Re: how can I trust glib when it has so manymemleaks?
  - From: David C. Hoos, Sr.
- Re: [gtk-list] Re: how can I trust glib when it has so manymemleaks?
  - From: Ionutz Borcoman
- Re: [gtk-list] Re: how can I trust glib when it has so manymemleaks?
  - From: Kevin Handy
- Unix Memory Management : Clearing up a few misconceptions (was Re: how can I trust glib when it has so manymemleaks?)
  - From: Guillaume Laurent
- Re: [gtk-list] Unix Memory Management : Clearing up a few misconceptions (was Re: how can I trust glib when it has so manymemleaks?)
  - From: Michael Babcock

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]